This e-book examines the potential eligibility criterion processes in connection, with Article 17 ECHR 1950, in conjunction with the substantive ECHR 1950 Articles protecting human rights. ARTICLE 17 – Prohibition of abuse of rights – Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act, aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.  In the first instance via an established and developing eligibility criterion. This is in relation Article 17, accessibility, scope, negation, aid to interpretation, application, dis-application, relied on or not relied on, case law decisions. This is in terms of the objective justification for the vindication of human rights, underpinned by a set of fundamental concepts and principles. These concepts and cases have been discussed in relation, to the obvious and potential human rights abuse violations, during Anglo-Irish / NI Conflict 1968-1998. Thereafter, demonstrated on the basis of European Court of Human Rights case law decisions. To date the Human Rights Court has resorted to Article 17 when dealing with issues under Articles 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 35, 3 (a) of the ECHR 1950 and Articles 1 and 3 of Protocol No. 1. Depending on the nature of a case, the Court can apply Article 17 directly or use it as a guide to interpretation. The question in relation to Article 17, going forward is. Is the door opening or closing, to further human rights conceptual developments? Moreover, will there be consequences for the range of human rights violations, during Anglo-Irish / NI Conflict 1968-1998?